I have filed in small claims court, against a corporation for an outstanding, unpaid invoice, for work done. Their attorney filed to have it changed to civil court, then did not show up for any of the court dates. The judge never heard the case, and signed a default judgement against them.

The corporation did end up paying the cost of the invoice without the late fees, penalties, or costs…. which were included in the default judgement. I am still interested in recovering those too. It has now been a month since the default judgement was signed.

When I filed against the corporation, I had to place the President of the corporations name. He was the mortal that represents their corporation.

I know someone, in Michigan, that lost a small claims case, and they had their drivers liscense suspended until the debt was paid.

Can this be done to the officer of a corporation, that’s study was on the lawsuit? And if so, how would I go about doing it?

Best answer:

Answer by kcracer1
ask your attorney

Add your own answer in the comments!

A creditor has ruled against me, and I declared bankruptcy. The debt was discharged. I saw it on the local court record website, I live in Maryland, and it states it was released. They sent me a letter saying that they ruled against me on the same day the court stated he was fired. The letter came from the actual company, a collection agency. What is my recourse? Do I send you just a copy of documents or bankruptcy can I do something about them actually lie. Thank you!

Best answer:

Answer by Rod O
Send them a copy of the discharge in bankruptcy and let them know if they contact you again you will file a complaint with the bankrutcy court asking for judgement against them. Harrassing a mortal after the debt is discharged can get you a money settlement against the creditor.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

It’s not all rosy news on these systems though.
Of course the biggest problem is the economy. You’re attempting to get debt by discovering assets at a time when everybody is broke. The second issue has to do with the job itself. You’re a harassing, threatening debt collection bureau of one. So you’re very regulated and it sucks to be you. New legislation is making it darn near impossible to seize assets of any type.

Let’s look at this an additional way. There’s a a lot superior way to approach debt and making money from it. Don’t you believe? Perhaps there’s a system that works even today. Maybe that would get your attention?
If you believe about it, the answer is simple and straightforward. Go after cash already collected and make a deal to return it.
When there are liens or judgements against the funds, you can make a deal for a huge cut of it. If there is no debt against it, you can contact the rightful owner and still make a killer deal.
All it takes is a small knowledge. A tiny direction will show you where to find the money.
The two most typical and profitable kinds of this money is in overbids and in unclaimed estate inheritances. And the monies are in apiece court in apiece county in the US.
These overbids or surplus proceeds come into play when a home sells for much more at auction than the bank is entitled to maintain. This can also be a result of monies from tax foreclosures carried out by the county to collect overdue or unpaid actual property taxes.

Liens in place at the time of the foreclosure auction are entitled to this cash unless they have expired. And if no debt against the money, the owner foreclosed upon can also be the rightful owner. However, judgement holders go out of business all of the time. So they don’t know about the money they’re entitled to. Exact same with mortgage holders. The owner prior to the foreclosure doesn’t hear about it either. The court in its infinite wisdom usually sends a letter to their foreclosure address.

The county clerk holds onto the money and then eventually sends it on to the state. And it never gets posted on the state’s unclaimed cash world wide web web site.

Estate cash has a comparable scenario. The court attempts to contact heirs at incorrect locations. Often the court also holds the estate cash because the individual entitled is a minor at the time it is produced. A lot can occur even though the individual is growing up. They’re in the wind all the time.
And, it gets you around finder laws. You don’t have limits as to how a lot you can make.
You ought to do this program instead of judgement recovery courses. It pays way a lot superior and is recession proof.
Head on over to 1 of the links that follow for much much more info and to get began immediately==

judgement recovery

judgement recovery courses

Patience and fortitude conquer all things.
- Emerson

how to purchase foreclosures

Judgement Recovery Courses – superior option

More Judgement For Debt Articles

Issue:

Whether a denial of Appellants’ motions to dismiss would constitute an abuse of discretion?

The court held that the Circuit Court’s decision to dismiss Appellees’ action did not constitute an abuse of discretion.

The 120-day period [within which the plaintiff must serve the defendant] is measured from the first issuance of original process directed to that defendant, not from the last issuance of process.  The complaint filed by Appellees on October 14, 2003, and which was never served, became “subject to dismissal” at the end of the day on February 11, 2004. The complaint filed by Appellees on February 7, 2005, became “subject to dismissal” at the end of the day on June 7, 2005. In light of the defendants’ addresses provided in those complaints, it is clear that the decision at issue was not “beyond the fringe of what [the Circuit Court] deems minimally acceptable.” The record also shows, however, that (1) no notification of contemplated dismissal was issued until September 14, 2007, eight days after Dr. Hariri and Dr. Blaik had been served, (2) no dismissal order had been entered by November 13, 2007, when Appellees filed their Amended Complaint, and (3) no dismissal order had been entered by November 15, 2007, when Dr. Hatfield filed his motion to dismiss.

Under these circumstances, in light of the fact that Appellees had until the end of the day on the twelfth anniversary of the alleged breach to file suit against Appellants, a denial of Appellants’ motions to dismiss would not have constituted an abuse of discretion.

The court of appeals held declining to dismiss the complaint for breach of contract with prejudice was appealable because it place the physicians “out of court” as to a dismissal with prejudice.  The notion embraced by the defendants and the Maryland Court of Special Appeals in this case, that an order terminating the case in the circuit court is not final and appealable unless it settles the rights of the celebrations or concludes the cause of action, has consistently and expressly been rejected by this Court.

Breach of contract lawsuit Baltimore Maryland Commercial Business Litigation

- – Netflix free 2 weeks! bit.ly MSNBC’s Dylan Ratigan – 16 April 2010 sec File civil action against Goldman Sachs Fraud MSNBC Security Exchange Commission too huge to change fraud con CDO derivatives Credit default swaps

Related Civil Lawsuit Articles

My friend was caught recently for shoplifting at a department store, which was a civil action and fine the penalty together with criminal Tresspassing if, on the return of property. He is now looking for a job and is not sure whether the shoplifting is shown in a background check. Is this something that no-show? He was not arrested, there were no fingerprints or mug shots taken. Data were only set in the department stores’ computer. And he received a letter from the prosecutor of the department store to collect the fine which he paid.

Best answer:

Answer by noble_savage
Of course. The civil lawsuit and the arrest are both matters of public record. You stated nothing to indicate that any of these records would be sealed.

EDIT: OK, yeah if there was no official arrest then that won’t show up. If there were any kind of court papers actually filed though, that still shows up and he’d possibly have to explain what it was all about.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

i live in NC and have a debt with mutual which is now in the hands of a collections attorney to wash. they wanted me to court and I done gave mthly payments. now they aree that do but they tell me to sign a consent decision. I should do or not? I’m lost! i can't afford a lawyer, but I’m afraid of pledges / remuneration garnishments, etc. What should I do!

Best answer:

Answer by sassy2
You signed the agreement as long as payments are what you concurred to. If you do not comprehend the paperwork then have someone read it for you. By paying this now you refrain and extra 3k for court costs.

What do you think? Answer below!

Where debts exist against the money, use that judgement to make a claim for the funds. If there is no lien or judgement to go after, then make a deal with the individual for a huge cut of the monies.
All it takes is a tiny knowledge. A tiny direction will show you where to find the money.
These monies can be found right at your local court house. The highest balances are in estate unclaimed funds and excess proceeds.
These overbids or surplus proceeds come into play when a home sells for more at auction than the bank is entitled to keep. This can also be a result of monies from tax foreclosures carried out by the county to collect overdue or unpaid real property taxes.
Liens in place at the time of the foreclosure auction are entitled to this money unless they have expired. And if no debt against the money, the owner foreclosed upon can also be the rightful owner. Unfortunately, 2nd mortgage or equity line mortgage debt has changed hands over and over, so they don’t get the notification. Judgement or lien holders go out of business or move without notifying the court of their new address. The owner prior to the foreclosure doesn’t hear about it either. The court in its infinite wisdom usually sends a letter to their foreclosure address.
So the money is just sitting there. And because the court doesn’t do title work, it doesn’t determine the ownership. So the monies are not listed on unclaimed money web sites.
Estate money has a similar situation. The court attempts to contact heirs at incorrect locations. Also, if the money was place into trust with the court when the entitled heir was a minor, it has to be held with the court. As you can imagine, the court loses track of these folks all the time.

You don’t have to worry about finder or locator laws because of the way the system works. This incredibly lucrative program can make you stupid money.
Don’t do judgement recovery business training courses. Select the program that is making people astounding money.
Head on over to either of the two links after this to get further info & to begin up right away–

judgement recovery business

or else hit this link…

how to purchase foreclosures

Man’s quest is always for adequate self-confidence to be himself.

Why Judgment Recovery Training Sucks

UHOH – Judgement Recovery Training

Best answer:

Answer by wad963
Well it depends on your say but in general it is the mortal who sued you that must enforce the judgement. If you do not want your consequence garnished or a lien on your property you should pay. Otherwise you can sit and move for them to take action.

Give your answer to this question below!

I had a child support case hearing on the babys mother and she didnt show up. They place a default judgement on her and scheduled another court date. What should I anticipate to happen with this default judgement.

Best answer:

Answer by George McCasland – Papa Bear
You don’t state if you or her has custody.

What do you think? Answer below!

This freedom was granted without the subsequent protections of the consumer included in these new laws. There currently exists no single body of consumer law covering the privacy of consumers. The private citizen must fight the triumvirate of bank,insurance and stock exchange through the court system for his own right to privacy.

Some says have granted the use of individual credit to be a determining bourgeois in the issuance of automobile insurance. However, two such states, Texas and Michigan have institutionalized say agencies to meticulously govern and manage those insurance bodies. These says have a socialized automobile security plan where individuals having bad credit or low income jobs can obtain economical coverage or liability automobile insurance.

True, apiece has rather strict guidelines by which a motorist can remember for low cost insurance. However, this is a two edged sword! The performance characteristics of apiece insurance bureau and company are meticulously maintained. These involve the speed with which legitimate claims are processed by the insurance company, customer satisfaction (both client and claimant), conformity to say and federal laws. A performance index is issued for apiece firm and their respective insurance costs are compared with both a say and federal cost per coverage. The say has created its own actuarial data base to evaluate insurance coverage. The motorist can freely view these to determine the ideal coverage for his situation. The consumer is given power that the insurance vendor can appreciate and respect.

This fact might give some satisfaction to the average motorist but some of us still want to know how good or bad credit make a motorist a good risk or a bad one. Perhaps it is an honesty issue! If I have good credit then I will always obey the rules of the road and none of life’s bad things will touch me. Does good credit mean that you can refrain being hit by a drunken driver, refrain having your automobile pushed off the highway into the nearby lake or have hail storms miss you? I can comprehend where the honesty of making constant insurance payments would be reflected in your credit but how does it establish insurance rates?

Reviewing the Report to the 79th Say of Texas Legislature, 2004 I discovered that insurance was not denied because of a bad credit score but that it could be a higher premium because of poor credit. Statistics showed that people in the 30 year age group has the worst credit and the greatest automobile restitution reported. My conclusion would not be that bad credit makes you careless. Rather my summation is that youth and proneness to erratic behavior was the cause. The point here is that there is no direct causal relationship but at the strongest an inferential connection.

Can automobile insurance through your Bad Credit history be affected?

Related Liability Automobile Insurance Articles